Safety of Clopidogrel vs. Ticagrelor in Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Regimens for High-Bleeding Risk Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis of Adverse Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Patients of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) at a high-bleeding risk (HBR) often require dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to reduce the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. Clopidogrel and ticagrelor are the most commonly used antiplatelet agents in DAPT regimens. However, the safety profiles of these drugs in ACS patients at HBR remain a subject of ongoing debate. AIM: To investigate any difference between the safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor used as a part of DAPT regimen in ACS patients at HBR. METHODS: A systematic search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify experimental and observational studies published up to the knowledge cutoff date in September 2023. Studies comparing the safety of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in ACS patients at HBR were included for analysis. The primary outcomes assessed were major bleeding events, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI), while secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and net adverse clinical and cerebral events (NACCE). RESULTS: We included a total of 8 observational studies in our meta-analysis. The pooled analysis revealed a statistically significant increase in the risk of MI (pooled RR = 1.43; 95% CI 1.12-1.83; P = 0.005) in the patients using clopidogrel. There were no statistically significant differences in major bleeding events (pooled RR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.82-1.09; P = 0.44), stroke (pooled RR = 1.36; 95% CI 0.86-2.14; P = 0.18), all-cause mortality (pooled RR = 1.17; 95% CI 0.97-1.41; P = 0.10), MACCE (pooled RR = 1.07; 95% CI 0.76-1.50; P = 0.69) and NACCE (pooled RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.66-1.37; P = 0.78) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses based on region were performed. CONCLUSION: Both drugs are generally safe for treating ACS patients with HBR at baseline, although a higher risk of MI was observed with the use of clopidogrel. Nevertheless, drug choice should factor in regional variations, patient-specific characteristics, cost, accessibility, and potential drug interactions.

Aspirin-free antiplatelet strategies after percutaneous coronary interventions.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the standard antithrombotic treatment after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Several trials have challenged guideline-recommended DAPT after PCI by testing the relative clinical effect of an aspirin-free antiplatelet approach-consisting of P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course (mostly 1-3 months) of DAPT-among patients undergoing PCI without a concomitant indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC). Overall, these studies have shown P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT to be associated with a significant reduction in the risk of bleeding without an increase in thrombotic or ischaemic events compared with continued DAPT. Moreover, the effects of the P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy without prior DAPT or following a very short course of DAPT after PCI are being investigated in emerging studies, of which one has recently reported unfavourable efficacy results associated with the aspirin-free approach compared with conventional DAPT. Finally, P2Y12 inhibitor alone has been compared with aspirin alone as chronic therapy after DAPT discontinuation, thus challenging the historical role of aspirin as a standard of care for secondary prevention following PCI. A thorough understanding of study designs, populations, treatments, results, and limitations of trials testing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. DAPT or vs. aspirin is required to consider adopting this treatment in clinical practice. This review addresses the use of aspirin-free antiplatelet strategies among patients undergoing PCI without a concomitant indication for OAC, providing an overview of clinical evidence, guideline indications, practical implications, ongoing issues, and future perspectives.

One year clinical outcome of dual anti-platelet therapy with the Novel Ticagrelor plus Aspirin versus Clopidogrel plus Aspirin for Endovascular Intervention of patients with Intracranial Aneurysm: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The use of stents to treat un-ruptured intracranial aneurysms was first approved in the year 2002 in the United States as a Humanitarian Device Exemption. Antiplatelet therapy is mandatory following stent placement. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel has been the first line agents for the prevention of thromboembolic events following neuro-endovascular procedures. However, clopidogrel hypo-responsiveness has often been observed. In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare one year clinical outcome of DAPT with the Novel Ticagrelor plus Aspirin versus Clopidogrel plus Aspirin for Endovascular Intervention of patients with Intracranial Aneurysm. METHODS: Online electronic databases were searched from June 2023 till July 2023 for relevant studies which compared DAPT with ticagrelor or clopidogrel for endovascular intervention in patients with intracranial aneurysm. The endpoints which were analyzed were classified into thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events. A fixed and a random effect statistical model were used during data analysis respectively. Risk ratio (RR) with 95 % confidence interval (CI) was used to represent the data following analysis. RESULTS: Five studies with a total number of 893 participants were included in this analysis. Three hundred and fifty eight (358) participants were assigned to the ticagrelor group whereas 535 participants were assigned to clopidogrel group. Participants' enrollment period ranged from the year 2009 to 2019. Our results showed that during a mean follow-up time period of one year, DAPT with ticagrelor was associated with significantly lower thromboembolic events with RR: 0.33, 95 % CI: 0.16 - 0.68; P = 0.003. In addition, at one year, DAPT with ticagrelor was not associated with any increase in hemorrhagic events (RR: 0.66, 95 % CI: 0.29 - 1.50; P = 0.32) when compared to DAPT with clopidogrel. CONCLUSION: At one year, DAPT with ticagrelor was associated with significantly lower thromboembolic events without any increase in hemorrhagic events when compared to clopidogrel associated DAPT for endovascular intervention of patients with intracranial aneurysm. However, even though ticagrelor-associated DAPT use appeared to be more effective and safe, this hypothesis should only be confirmed in larger upcoming trials.

Validation of prediction tools for GI bleeding in patients on dual anti-platelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The management of dual anti-platelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and GI bleeding (GIB) remains a clinical dilemma. We sought to identify predictors of GIB and recurrent bleeding and to determine whether recurrent bleeding increases the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, patients undergoing PCI were identified. The primary and secondary endpoints were GIB at 180 days and recurrent bleeding or MACE at 365 days. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of GIB and recurrent bleeding. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to determine whether recurrent bleeding can predict a MACE. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-six patients were included. On multivariable analysis, PCI for acute coronary syndrome was associated with a 95% increased odds of GIB (P < .001). The P2Y12 inhibitor was continued in >90% of patients, which trended toward significance for recurrent bleeding (P < .10). The HAS-BLED score (Hypertension, Abnormal renal and liver function, Stroke, Bleeding tendency or predisposition, Labile INRs, Elderly, Drugs), including a labile international normalized ratio and prior major bleeding, was strongly associated with recurrent bleeding (P ≤ .009). Recurrent bleeding was associated with a 115% increased risk of MACEs (P = .02). We derived a novel risk score, named the SIGE score ([S]TEMI at PCI, having a labile [I]NR at PCI, index [G]IB within 180 days of PCI, and previous precatheterization [E]ndoscopy within 6 months), to predict recurrent bleeding at 365 days with a high predictive accuracy (area under the curve, .773; 95% confidence interval, .702-.845). CONCLUSIONS: The SIGE score may help to predict recurrent bleeding, which was shown to be associated with an increased risk of MACEs. Further external validation is needed.

Tailoring antiplatelet therapy in older patients with coronary artery disease.

The older population represents a unique subset of patients due to a higher rate of comorbidities and risk factors, which can lead to a higher rate of ischemic and bleeding events. As a result, older adults are mainly underrepresented or excluded from randomized trials. Although the advancement in the percutaneous coronary intervention field with the development of new technologies, techniques, and potent antiplatelet therapy led to a reduction of ischemic risk, there is still a concern regarding bleeding hazards. Apart from the global utilization of less invasive trans-radial approach and proton pump inhibitors to reduce bleeding risk, proper tailoring of antiplatelet therapy in the older person is imperative. So far, several antiplatelet drugs have been introduced in different clinical scenarios, with dual antiplatelet therapy (combination of acetylsalicylic acid and P2Y12 inhibitor) recommended after percutaneous coronary intervention. The decision on the choice of antiplatelet drug and the DAPT duration is challenging and should be based on the relationship between ischemia and bleeding with the purpose of reducing ischemic events but not at the expense of increased bleeding complications. This is particularly important in the older population, where the evidence is obscure. The main objective of this review is to summarize the available evidence on contemporary antiplatelet therapy and different approaches of de-escalation strategies in older patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

What is the context?The older population represents a unique subset of patients due to a higher rate of comorbidities, risk factors, and unfavorable prognostic features, which can lead to a higher rate of ischemic and bleeding events. They are either excluded or underrepresented in most randomized clinical trials, which is why guidelines recommendation should be taken cautiously. Thus, the decision on the choice of antiplatelet therapy and its duration after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults is challenging and should be tailored to a particular patient to avoid bleeding complications but not at the expense of increased ischemic events.What is new?In this review, we summarize all available evidence on contemporary antiplatelet therapy and different approaches of de-escalation strategies in older patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. In particular, several recommended approaches in patients with high bleeding risk, are thoroughly discussed in this review: De-escalation strategies with discontinuation of one antiplatelet drugDe-escalation strategy with switching between P2Y12 inhibitorsDe-escalation strategy based on dose reductionFinally, based on the current knowledge on factors contributing to high bleeding risk and the aforementioned antiplatelet modification approaches, in this review, we propose antiplatelet algorithm after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults.What is the impact?The review provides comprehensive knowledge on antiplatelet therapy in older population and may help in tailoring antiplatelet therapy in this unique subset of patients.

In-Hospital and 1-Year Clinical Results from the French Registry Using Polymer-Free Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome and Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

Objectives: The aim of this postmarket clinical study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the latest generation polymer-free sirolimus-eluting stents (PF-SES) in an all-comers population comparing outcomes in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) versus acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in France. Background: The efficacy and safety of the first-generation PF-SES have already been demonstrated by randomized controlled trials and "all-comers" observational studies. Methods: For this all-comers observational, prospective, multicenter study, 1456 patients were recruited in 22 French centers. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate at 12 months and secondary endpoints included major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and bleeding. Results: 895 patients had stable CAD and 561 had ACS. At 12 months, 2% of patients had a TLR, with similar rates between stable CAD and ACS (1.9% vs 2.2%, p = 0.7). The overall MACE rate was 5.2% with an expected higher rate in patients with ACS as compared to those with stable CAD (7.3% vs 3.9%, p = 0.007). The overall bleeding event rate was 4.5%, with similar rates in stable CAD as compared to ACS patients (3.8% vs 5.6%, p = 0.3). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) interruptions prior to the recommended duration occurred in 41.7% of patients with no increase in MACE rates as compared to patients who did not prematurely interrupt DAPT (3.9% vs 6.1%, p = 0.073). Conclusions: The latest generation PF-SES is associated with low clinical event rates in these all-comers patients. There was a high rate of prematurely terminated DAPT, without any effect on MACE at 12 months. This trial is registered with NCT03809715.

Bleeding and Ischemic Risk Prediction in Patients With High Bleeding Risk (an EVOLVE Short DAPT Analysis).

The EVOLVE Short DAPT study demonstrated the safety of truncated dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with a high bleeding risk (HBR) treated with SYNERGY stent(s) (Boston Scientific Company, Marlborough, Massachusetts). In this population, bleeding and ischemic risk prediction may further inform DAPT decisions. This post hoc analysis of the EVOLVE Short DAPT study identified predictors of ischemic and bleeding events up to 15 months using Cox proportional hazard models. The predicted probabilities of bleeding were calculated using the Breslow method. Of 2,009 enrolled patients, 96.9% of the patients met at least 1 HBR criteria. At 15 months, the cumulative incidences of bleeding and ischemic events were 6.3% and 6.0%, respectively. The risk of bleeding was increased in patients who received oral anticoagulants (hazard ratio [HR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.50 to 3.36, p <0.001) or had peripheral vascular disease (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.56, p = 0.045). The risk of ischemic events was increased in patients with diabetes (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.78, p <0.01) or congestive heart failure (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.39 to 3.04, p <0.001). Renal insufficiency/failure was associated with both endpoints. There was a strong positive correlation between the predicted probability of ischemic and bleeding events (R = 0.77, p <0.001). In 617 patients with a predicted bleeding risk <4%, ischemic events predominated, and the ischemic and bleeding rates were higher in patients with a predicted bleeding risk ≥4%. Within an HBR cohort, specific characteristics identify patients at a higher risk for ischemic and separately, bleeding events. Increased bleeding risk is tied to increased ischemic risk. In conclusion, standardized risk models are needed to inform DAPT decisions in patients with a higher risk. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02605447.

Short dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention in high bleeding risk patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and stent thrombosis. However, DAPT duration is a concern in high bleeding risk (HBR) patients. We evaluated the effect of short DAPT (1-3 months) compared to standard DAPT (6-12 months) on bleeding and ischemic events in HBR PCI. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL up to August 18, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing short DAPT (1-3 months) versus standard DAPT in HBR PCI were included. We assessed risk of bias (RoB) using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, and certainty of evidence using GRADE criteria. Outcomes included MACE, all-cause death, stent thrombosis, major bleeding, and the composite of major or clinically-relevant non-major bleeding. We estimated risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a random-effects model. RESULTS: From 503 articles, we included five RCTs (n = 7,242) at overall low risk of bias with median follow-up of 12-months. Compared to standard DAPT, short DAPT did not increase MACE (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.84-1.23), all-cause death (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.71-1.20) or stent thrombosis (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.73-2.93). Short DAPT reduced major bleeding (RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.90) and the composite of major or clinically-relevant non-major bleeding (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.44-0.81), translating to 21 and 34 fewer events, respectively, per 1000 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In HBR PCI, DAPT for 1-3 months compared to 6-12 months reduced clinically-relevant bleeding events without jeopardizing ischemic risk. Short DAPT should be considered in HBR patients receiving PCI.

Temporal variations in ischemic and bleeding event risks after acute coronary syndrome during dual antiplatelet therapy.

BACKGROUND: This study estimates the temporal risk variations of ischemic and bleeding events during dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) among patients stratified according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) criteria, suggesting the optimal period for DAPT after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: A total of 1264 ACS patients receiving either clopidogrel or prasugrel with aspirin were classified by ARC-HBR; HBR (n = 574) and non-HBR groups (n = 690). This study was designed as a multicenter observation to evaluate the primary endpoints of ischemic, including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke, and bleeding events, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type 3/5. The temporal risk variations were estimated using the Cox hazard and Royston-Parmar models. RESULTS: Ischemic and bleeding events were observed in 9.4% and 7.4%, respectively, during an average observation period of 313 days. The HBR group had a higher incidence of both events than the non-HBR group (15.3% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.01 for ischemic; 11.9% vs. 3.8%, P < 0.01 for bleeding). The estimated risk curves for both events revealed peaks and steep declines in the first few days, followed by constant declines. The peak of risk was higher for bleeding than for ischemic events, but this relationship reversed early, with ischemic events displaying a higher risk in both the HBR and non-HBR groups until at least 60 days. CONCLUSIONS: A 60-day period of DAPT is appropriate to balance the risks of adverse events after ACS, regardless of ARC-HBR criteria.

Short Versus Long Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation in Patients with Diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain, with increasing data suggestive of acceptable short-term duration. Metabolically accelerated atherosclerosis associated with diabetes makes it essential to study short-term DAPT in this subgroup. With limited studies determining optimal DAPT strategies after second-generation stents in this subset, we aimed to establish the optimal duration of DAPT in the diabetic population using second-generation stents. QUESTION: To determine optimal DAPT duration in diabetic population undergoing PCI in 2nd generation stents. DATA SOURCES: We conducted an electronic database search of randomized controlled trials from PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. STUDY DESIGN: A meta-analysis was conducted comparing outcomes of short-term (3-6 months) DAPT therapy versus long-term (12 months) DAPT therapy in the diabetic population undergoing PCI with second-generation stents. RESULTS: A total of 5 randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 3117 diabetic patients. Short-term DAPT did not show any statistical difference from long-term DAPT in achieving primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68-1.35, P = 0.84). Overall mortality (OR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.52-1.63, P = 0.98), myocardial infarction [odds ratio (OR)OR 1.02; 95% CI, 0.53-1.94, P = 0.85], stent thrombosis (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 0.55-2.60, P = 0.55), target vessel revascularization (OR 1.10; 95% CI, 0.45-2.73, P = 0.74), and stroke (OR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.082-2.43, P = 0.81) did not show any statistical difference between the 2 groups. Similarly, a subgroup analysis of study population comparing 6 versus 12 months of DAPT in diabetic population did not show any difference in net primary outcomes (relative ratio: 0.86, 95% CI 0.45-1.45, P = 0.60). There was no significant heterogeneity noted between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed no statistically significant benefit of longer DAPT over shorter DAPT therapy in patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stent in patients with diabetes.

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after complex percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

It remains unknown whether the recent trend of short dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy can simply be applied to patients undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. conventional DAPT in patients undergoing complex PCI and non-complex PCI (PROSPERO: CRD42022335723). Primary endpoint was the 1-year Net Adverse Clinical Event (NACE). Among 5,323 screened studies, six randomized trials fulfilled the eligibility criteria. A total of 10,588 complex PCI patients (5,269 vs. 5,319 patients) and 25,618 non-complex PCI patients (12,820 vs 12,798 patients) were randomly assigned to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy vs. conventional DAPT. In complex PCI patients, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of NACE than conventional DAPT [Odds ratio (OR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.91, P = 0.003], whereas in non-complex PCI patients, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy was associated with a trend toward lowering the risk of NACE (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.72-1.02, P = 0.09). This meta-analysis across randomized trials demonstrated that a strategy of short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy reduces the risk of 1-year NACE in patients undergoing complex PCI.

P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy 1 to 3 mo after PCI did not differ from standard DAPT for fatal or ischemic events.

SOURCE CITATION: Gragnano F, Mehran R, Branca M; Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (Sidney-2) Collaboration. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy after complex percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:537-552. 36754514.

Defining Strategies of Modulation of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Consensus Document from the Academic Research Consortium.

Antiplatelet therapy is the mainstay of pharmacologic treatment to prevent thrombotic or ischemic events in patients with coronary artery disease treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and those treated medically for an acute coronary syndrome. The use of antiplatelet therapy comes at the expense of an increased risk of bleeding complications. Defining the optimal intensity of platelet inhibition according to the clinical presentation of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and individual patient factors is a clinical challenge. Modulation of antiplatelet therapy is a medical action that is frequently performed to balance the risk of thrombotic or ischemic events and the risk of bleeding. This aim may be achieved by reducing (ie, de-escalation) or increasing (ie, escalation) the intensity of platelet inhibition by changing the type, dose, or number of antiplatelet drugs. Because de-escalation or escalation can be achieved in different ways, with a number of emerging approaches, confusion arises with terminologies that are often used interchangeably. To address this issue, this Academic Research Consortium collaboration provides an overview and definitions of different strategies of antiplatelet therapy modulation for patients with coronary artery disease, including but not limited to those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and consensus statements on standardized definitions.

Age and outcomes following personalized antiplatelet therapy in chronic coronary syndrome patients: a post hoc analysis of the randomized PATH-PCI trial.

It is particularly important to establish more effective and safer antiplatelet treatment strategies according to age. The present subanalysis of the PATH-PCI trial was to determine the safety and efficacy of any dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategy in different age groups. We randomized 2285 chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) into a standard group or a personalized group from December 2016 to February 2018. The personalized group received personalized antiplatelet therapy (PAT) based on a novel platelet function test (PFT). The standard group received standard antiplatelet therapy (SAT). Then, all patients were divided according to age (under the age of 65 years and aged 65 years or over) to investigate the association and interaction of age on clinical outcomes at 180 days. In the patients under the age of 65 years, the incidence of NACEs was decreased in the personalized group compared to the standard group (5.1% vs. 8.8%, HR: 0.603, 95% CI: 0.409-0.888, P = .010). The rates of MACCEs (3.3% vs. 7.7%, HR: 0.450, 95% CI: 0.285-0.712, P = .001), MACEs (2.2% vs. 5.4%, HR: 0.423, 95% CI: 0.243-0.738, P = .002) also decreased. We did not find a significant difference in bleeding between the groups. In the patients aged 65 years or over, no difference in the primary endpoint was found (4.9% vs. 4.2%, P = .702), and comparable rates of survival were observed with the two strategies (all Ps > 0.05). The present study shows that PAT according to PFT was comparable to SAT at the 180-day follow-up for both ischemic and bleeding endpoints in CCS patients aged 65 years or over who underwent PCI. In patients under the age of 65 years, PAT can reduce ischemic events but does not increase bleeding, and it is an effective and safe treatment strategy. It may be necessary for young CCS patients after PCI to undergo PAT early after PCI.

What is the context? The PATH-PCI trial reported that personalized antiplatelet therapy (PAT) based on a novel platelet function test (PFT) can greatly reduce the incidence of ischemic events.Antiplatelet strategies may have very different effects on clinical outcomes in patients in China who are undergoing PCI at different ages.What is new? PL-12 is a new point-of-care platelet function analyzer that is used to test the platelet maximum aggregation rate (MAR).We explored the efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet strategies in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients in different age groups.What is the impact? PAT according to PFT was comparable to standard antiplatelet therapy (SAT) at the 180-day follow-up for both ischemic and bleeding endpoints in CCS patients aged 65 years or over who underwent PCI.In patients under the age of 65 years, PAT can reduce ischemic events but not increase bleeding.PAT may be an effective and safe treatment strategy in CCS patients under the age of 65 years who underwent PCI.Abbreviation: PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; CCS: chronic coronary syndrome; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; PAT: personalized antiplatelet therapy; SAT: standard antiplatelet therapy; PFT: platelet function test; NACEs: net adverse clinical events; MACCEs: major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events; MACEs: major adverse cardiovascular events.

What Is the Optimal Duration of Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Optimal duration of antiplatelet therapy continues to attract extensive debates and has been progressively adjusted in the setting of advancements in stent design and assessment of patient clinical characteristics. Given the ever-changing landscape of antiplatelet therapy and the multitude of clinical trials that have examined this duration, there are varying scenarios for optimal duration based on patient presentation and risk profile. This review highlights the current concepts and recommendations regarding duration of antiplatelet therapy in coronary heart disease. RECENT FINDINGS: In particular, we review the current data on the use of dual antiplatelet therapy in the different clinical scenarios. Relatively longer dual antiplatelet therapy is perhaps limited to patients with higher risk for cardiovascular events and/or high-risk lesions and shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy have been shown to reduce bleeding complications at the same time as stabilization of ischemic endpoints. More recent trials have demonstrated the safety of shorter durations of dual antiplatelet therapy in appropriate patients with coronary heart disease.

Outcomes with P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after PCI according to bleeding risk: A Bayesian meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is a promising novel strategy to reduce bleeding complications compared to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In order to personalise treatment with DAPT based on patients' bleeding risk, we compared outcomes after PCI between P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy and DAPT according to bleeding risk. METHODS: A search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short period of DAPT to standard DAPT after PCI was performed. Outcome differences between treatment groups regarding major bleedings, major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE) and net adverse clinical events (NACE) were assessed with hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding credible intervals (CrI) according a Bayesian random effects model in patients with and without high bleeding risk (HBR). RESULTS: Five RCTs including 30,084 patients were selected. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy compared to DAPT reduced major bleedings in the total population (HR: 0.65, 95 % CrI: 0.44 to 0.92). The HRs of the HBR and non-HBR subgroups showed a similar reduction of bleedings for monotherapy (HBR: HR 0.66, 95 % CrI: 0.25 to 1.74; non-HBR: HR 0.63, 95 % CrI: 0.36 to 1.09). No notable differences between treatments on MACCE and NACE were observed in either sub-group or in the total population. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of bleeding risk, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is the favourable choice after PCI regarding major bleedings and does not increase ischemic events compared to DAPT. This suggests that bleeding risk is not decisive when considering P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.

Pathophysiology and Optimal Treatment of Intracranial Branch Atheromatous Disease.

Intracranial branch atheromatous disease (BAD) is a pathological condition characterized by the occlusion of a relatively large perforating branch (700-800 µm) near the orifice of a parent artery due to atherosclerotic plaque-based thrombus (microatheroma). BAD is refractory to treatment and follows a course of progressive exacerbation, especially motor paralysis. Uniform treatment for common atherothrombotic cerebral infarction or lacunar infarction does not prevent the progressive exacerbation of BAD, and consequently affects functional prognosis. To date, various combinations of treatments have been investigated and proposed to attenuate the worsening symptoms of BAD. However, no therapy with established efficacy is yet available for BAD. Since it is the most difficult condition to treat in the area of cerebral infarction, the establishment of optimal treatment methods for BAD is keenly awaited. This review presents an overview of the acute treatments available for BAD and discusses the prospects for optimal treatment.